Beyond Centralization

Someone may write something as observation, and another may read it as knowledge.

For example power is concealed in those upper people in society, the people who are close to god or carry more production power, and the humble people will accept. A writer would write this as an opinion, but the reader might read it as an instruction a command or as dictated or given. Although that can be written down in better way: ” In observations of societal structures, it becomes apparent that power is often subtly entrenched among those in upper positions—those perceived as closer to divine authority or possessing significant productive capacity. This observation might suggest a division where the less influential, or humble members of society, tend to accept their roles.”., however, when writing informal though-flowing blog posts, such form of manipulation of text if not originally written, is not authentic, and comes across as cold, calculative, often not meant for masses who will fail to read and understand it at all. So rather, smaller fragments which are given to let them to think upon, would eventually lead to their satisfaction and their opinion based on given facts or segments of thoughts to build their thought process upon.

Well, the thing to discuss was this: Imagine you are just getting good at some thing but another group outcompetes you keeping you out of business but delivering results to entire society. That is of course good, but its also bad. As the growth becomes centered around that new entity, and vast developments go around with those people, and the people with their own ideas about it will never get to implement their own. They will never get such a resource power, due to incapacity of funding expensive projects which rather cater to little to no demand and only satisfy princely curiosity of one. Unless of course they would work on other topics and things. But it seems to much to be asking for realistically. For example, you can’t just get another silicon fab lab next to your house, and have yourself or hired someone work on designs and get them fabricated on daily basis to cater to the development roadmap. Or, the material manufacturing generalist factory where anything can be made from basic tools, in automated form (by programming the factory sequence and design at each step). Those things are still things of the future, and while one may never need them, they are essential for diversification and custom intellectual growing environment where innovation lies in the hands of many. This also should be such that it does not interfere with their constrained existence in society where one’s making may adversely influence other, which is quite given to today’s society standards.

Imagine making a safe custom car, custom airjet, custom bike, a custom robot, a custom ai model all based on very standard global tools. of course standardization makes it simple, but it also makes it harder to fix things after they break, which makes it non-sustainable. The amount of technology that can exist in a given space is limitless, as the same space 1000 years in future would be inhabited with unthinkable technology, from engineering at sub quantum scale, complex forms of existence and arrangement of matter and exotic matter can be derived to form unthinkable machines or devices. The one’s you see for example in planet crafter. It needs an idea, with spread out use of tool set with automation to achieve the current next goal and keep on evolving it till it reaches that form of idea.

Also, while it may be harder for 1 person to do the thinking work of 10 people, while 10 people may collectively be able to have space of vast possibilities. Having one is limited, having two already adds a space connection upto the communication limit. For example, you could ask another person to manipulate something on other side of the globe, and essentially this duo would be working as an giant two-physical body separated large distances organism capable of actions at both ends of planet. But as only one person, its reach is only to actions it can take through its own hands. And then, if there is a group of 100 people, the amount of possible output can be different.