Connecting to unconscious

“Meta”, No proof, only thoughts and experiences.
Understanding what thought one is actually thinking underneath, and connect it to the body in an efficient but controlled manner. Such that the brain’s conscious is under control. Unconscious is uncontrolled. But body is in full control of actions, but reflexes and minor reactions, maybe not. Brain is in control.
Unconscious is a rapid changing thing which is affected by the external stimuli. Much like the liquid state machine, with sensory inputs (eyes, ears, touch etc.) driving the unconscious. Conscious is the attentive state of such unconscious with decision making power. However, there is the issue of ‘free will’ (debatable). There is also a bias in understanding (belief) which drives individuals consciousness in making decisions. Body responds to thoughts based on beliefs (body language, like muscle twitches, mouth engulfs, and other sounds). One needs to unlearn and learn their body to get accustomed to their new self. Also, the reflection of first language, however rarely is been used, comes to the fore. The old memories resurface easily. One might just think like the information was dissipated in the nature is recollected back, however, the context of the actual memories is questionable. Perhaps, the feelings of surroundings feature back.

One with their own beliefs can form a system of understanding which is helpful in their personal as well as collective goals. Its the affair with the nature. Responding to the voices (thoughts) that one makes up from the signals they receive. Which is essentially what unconscious does.
Beliefs uproot strongly from the first language of thinking, if there are many, all of them collectively. However, multiple meanings can cause confusions if not rationalized.

*This para was written on the fly, so the thoughts are not concentrated but are flown through multiple branches on the tree.*

“Entities.. , in a sense are the other beings (humans, mammals, etc.) with nature (trees, objects, that do not directly feel). Laws of physics hold the objects with love (and are discovered through time as more knowledge is obtained. Before the discovery its just mystical entity). However, when comparing humans vs other species. its clearly not the case. Other species must be at the exactly same understanding as a human being. Neither every human being knows about it all, so are the physics laws for each being different? no. So thinking does not create the future. Everything just exists and is understood through time, and sort of lived through it. ” Strange, that when I thought it was all air, like “thinking creates the future and can alter the state of matter if every human being believes differently”. However, there is a concept where other beings and nature is just the state of mind. Here, one runs into a simulation paradox, however, the moral reason does not justify it, when called for the equality of beings, and makes no further attempt in normal cases. Simulation paradox entitles to a being the understanding that they are living in a simulation, but with the consequences that are out of their control if they do not consider others. Fear of death is the major driver, however, minor losses and fall of pride are too. Death is not just physical, its mental, at every time, old past is getting being reborn into a present. The future is just the collection of thoughts that has the potential to materialize, or is just to airy of spacey (impossible) with known understanding- magic. What is when the goal a person wants to achieve fail. To achieve them, repeated trials are generally taken for something new. Once it has been established, repeating the process generates the results quickly.

There is also the hypothesis of multiverses, the other universes existing simultaneously, however, such hypothesis are not useful in a sense for current reality, without creating havoc in the ‘real’ universe. Also, other theory is where we are a 3D movie watched by 4D beings, and the graphics are just different. however, the beings are not so interested in the genre of movies we watch, but more like a monk trying to watch people living and understanding life. When one thinks of the universe like this. It has no proof but thought, which is probably not real in nature. It will be unclear until the idea how thoughts are generated is known. The idea is that multiple extrapolations exists in thought for a sampled universe, which can be only be made more clear and concrete by sampling the space in between.
If thinking is affected by the noise, if one considers every noise as pseudorandom noise , as it is generated from other sources, like radiation, which meet at a point in space giving the collective information. This information may affect the neuronal activity.

Human brain as a literal radio bulb and a receiver – just an extrapolated thought.

dual meaning of texts people write and read in their own contextual life – correlations, correlations are subjective, “correlations does not imply causation” but what is the definition of causation?, is it the literal understanding of the world that is used to define causation. But what is the true causation. Where to draw a line between correlation and causation? “Correlations does not imply causation” but, at some level they start implying. Where is the boundary and what happens to causality after higher detailed levels are revealed. Perhaps the past knowledge becomes a lie and and new knowledge becomes the truth. (pseudo-truth). Such is the nature of science. Statistics will only save from there, such that how much it matters overall.