Learning the behavior, .. co-existence, awareness

When humans do things, things are complex like human,
when robot does things, things can be simple.

A large amount of thinking that we do, or at least I do, is about behaving, learning to behave, and learning to decide (predict and add to do-list) the actions to take.
Humans are largely influenced by other humans, throughout evolutionary time-scales, and behavior is largely dependent on other human counter-parts that take part in interaction. Humans are exotic beings, or any existence with complex neural thinking is capable of demonstrating complex behavior, and can have enormous states of realization in existing.

An example of social interaction setting, for example, the communication between two people can be in many forms. An example of which, considering a setting involves no bias toward the subject, subject is also a stranger, and for any meaningful interaction which conveys something to the subject, it needs to have an interest (which can be of any kind), if there is lack of interest, then there is no meaningful communication. If any person has lack of interest, the person can attend to the conversation in a forced manner or conversation from initiator is ignored, and if both the entities have interest in each other, then conversation is two-way.

However, communication between two entities in just one of the examples. However, the mode of communication is not mentioned in previous paragraph, as it can be all forms possible, signs and signals of any form.
However, when signals are conveyed, they are conveyed with intention, if there was no intention to convey, the signal is simply an noise to what is suggested. Also, due to 3d nature of the space, say a sign of an entity A having to arise in the awareness space of the other entity B, the received signal of other entity A received with the entity B can be a form of communication as well, although, it would only imply the restrictions to travel and co-exist. However, the other person A may also arise in the field of awareness of the B with intention to interact with B, however in this setting, unless B is sure of A’s intention, the scenario is unclear to B.

Field of awareness : A perceiving entity (with feelings of consciousness or without) has the reach of its felt awareness.
Awareness can arise from multiple forms or ways to a being which have feelings of consciousness, but for entities or structure (that we would like to call) such as robots, their field of awareness can be achieved using sensors.
At the root level, the field of awareness is simply the information contained in the entity, which in this magical existing universe that somehow has sentient beings, becomes aware (conscious experi) of the meaning of information.

Co-existing entities: Entities can interact with each other, in a way which supports them or grows them, births them, or in a way which eliminates them. It applies when entities are eternal in a sense the rest of the stuff (U-A-B which is universe excluding entities A and B, does not and can not degrade either of them to cease away from existence), however, in reality, the entities are degraded with flow of universe (or time).

So when entities like human beings who are aware of their death, result in a different behavior than those who are not aware of the possibility of their death.
However, for two entities to co-exist, given the degradation due to time, two entities can support each other to prolong their lifespan, however, given the natural setting, it is unclear for an entity to which actions to take so that eventually it results in the optimal prolongation of their lifespan, as some mal-informed decisions can shorten the lifespan and act as if entities are destroying each other.