Triton 47

Triton 47 › Consciousness & mind › The maker turn

Nature of understanding, and understanding of nature

· 512 words · 2 min read · 1 like on WordPress

Index note blind men & elephant; include the observer; Elliphant "One More"

We know about this world, this universe, or so we think. This may just be me trying to clarify the understanding of this world. We have access to definition based understanding, say of charges, and electric and magnetic field, and mass, and gravity. Its like we have named the legs, the trunk, the eyes, the tail, the torso, but are we looking at the elephant itself…? I mean at the universe as it is without the definitions. Definitions can help understand, but in the end they are.. just.. words or definitions behaving certain way, and if one when reading, only reads the words, and the the exact meaning or association is not thought of or gotten into with, then the system of such knowledge can struggle to make human beings understand about the reality. There is a vast number of imaginations that can just exist in the assumptious mind of the being, which can distort the meaning of these words such as positive and negative charge, electric field lines, electric potential, etc.. such things do not exist in reality as they are, but are a mere observable effect, or definition that helps to identify a way of looking at it which is not exactly the whole thing which is being looked at. So even if its correct, a new human being when understanding can run into many issues while correctly understanding it, and ultimately leading to uselessness of that knowing.

One must also not just be an observer of the reality considering reality as external, but also include the effect of observer and acknowledge the existence of the self, leading to the external reality being observed. Lack of including the self in the equation can already lead to wrong results about true absolute nature of reality and existence.

While still struggling to look everything as a part of one thing, in this imaginative mind that exists. However, its “one definition suits all” concept, ultimately leading to energy and fabric of this universe, which exists at root level, and somehow these all lead to charge, mass, forces (force is a generic term came after the effect of motion it has on the object, however, for human conscious experi, the force is felt through sensation and is one of the feelings of consci).

World exists, flows based on forces and effect felt by experi in the beings, but fear that is something suboptimal or not exact and there is more to it?, are there cosmological plans through time?, such as destiny and fate, but are they just extrapolated version of reality that is bound to happen due to such colossal laws of the world that has no control of consci, or is consci rather just a side effect of the ride, that is the flow of this world (rather not). A being with shattered beliefs ( or broken chains of unsure beilef), the only thing can believe is their own senses of the world near vicinity in that sensory space.

Although, I may not understand the world fully, it goes on,…

Elliphant- One More

#Consciousness #philosophy #religion #science #spirituality

Original: https://triton7777.wordpress.com/2024/09/17/nature-of-understanding-and-understanding-of-nature/